Phone.: +45 9940 8192 • Email: email@example.com
VAT no.: 29102384 • EAN no.: 5798000420656 • P numbers: Aalborg: 1003888237, Copenhagen: 1018019139
07.09.2020 kl. 13.30 - 09.09.2020 kl. 15.00
Client participation is a popular concept, generally carrying positive connotations among both administrators and citizen advocates: “It connotes openness and transparency, inclusion and diversity, democracy and voice, equality and deliberation…” (Kelty et al. 2015: 475). Participation is regarded important in combatting social exclusion (Stevens, Bur and Young 2003), contributing to democratization, increasing the self-efficacy of clients, building communities, increasing service efficiency and effectiveness, ensuring fairness and holding government agencies accountable (Mizrahi, Humphreys and Torres 2009; Alford 2009: 37). In addition, participation has become an important source of legitimacy, and public agencies are increasingly expected to enable citizen participation (Kelty et al. 2015). With the advance of new public governance, citizens are also increasingly expected to participate actively, contributing to the delivery of public services to themselves and others. This however leads to new paradoxes, as municipalities “simultaneously want to empower its citizens and control the output of their activities.” (Hansen & Gemal 2014: 3; see also Borghi and van Berkel 2007: 422). With all the different and somewhat contradictory tasks participation is expected to perform, it is important to examine different forms of participation in order to analyze how participation works in specific contexts.
Lipsky pointed out that client participation has a dual function both as a means to secure individual and fair treatment and as a way of legitimizing the agency’s intervention in the clients’ lives and the control of clients (Lipsky 1980: 42-43). Hence, participation can be non-voluntary for clients and street-level organizations may seek to persuade clients to participate actively in the system (Lipsky 1980: 43). In this context, client participation can be seen as part of an organizational goal of client control as well as a source of organizational legitimacy. White calls for a detailed examination of the concept of participation and the interests it serves and underscores that “participation is not always in the interests of the poor. Everything depends on the type of participation, and the terms on which it is offered. […] exit may be the most empowering option” (White 2011: 64). Hence, it should not be taken for granted that client participation is empowering or liberating to clients. The concept client participation may be regarded problematic for this very reason, since client participation may imply user control and empowerment, but it may also imply treatment participation or even client compliance. Hence, notions of inclusion through client participation remain problematic as long as it remains obscure what participation entails and what the goals of participation are, e.g. involving people in decisions made about them or making services cheaper (Stevens et al. 2003: 90).
Participation has long been an important concept in a range of disciplines (e.g. political sciences, social work, rural development, media studies). The popularity of the concept of participation has led scholars to be wary that the concept may become “drained of substance” (Cohen and Uphoff 2011: 34). Across different streams of research, there is not a common conceptualization of client participation.
The aim of the course is to familiarize students with classical and contemporary perspectives on client participation, to enable students to critically discuss assumptions, methodological approaches and empirical results regarding client participation. In addition, the course aims at furthering the PhD-students work on constructing a theoretical framework and methodological approach to a specific research problem in the student’s own ongoing or planned project.
This PhD course addresses both PhD students within social sciences and humanities as well as students within health sciences. The lecturers are primarily from the fields of sociology and social work, but the theoretical concepts and concerns raised have broader relevance, e.g. in terms of patient participation.
The course alternates between lectures on client participation and workshops where participants present their own work and get feedback from other students and lecturers. All students (also those participating without paper) should present their work and comment on the work of the other participants. Written and oral presentations take place throughout the course.
Learning outcomes will be examined through an individually written working paper. Students should submit their course paper 1 week prior to the course. Students choose their own topic, preferably in line with their topic of doctoral research. Papers can be written in the form of a scientific article with the exception that the draft for the course will allow 3.500 words (maximum) including references. Submission of course papers no later than September 25th 2020 (please find more info at PhD moodle)
Tone Alm Andreassen, Oslo Metropolitan University
Karen Christensen, Roskilde University
Tanja Dall, Aalborg University
Dorte Caswell, Aalborg University
Maja Lundemark Andersen, Aalborg University
Merete Monrad, Aalborg University (course coordinator)
The course is free of charge for PhD-students enrolled at the Doctoral School of Social Sciences, Aalborg University participants not enrolled at Aalborg University need to pay a fee of 300 DKK. There will be a maximum of 20 participants.
Registration will be in PhD moodle: (link will follow later)
ECTS: 4 with paper, 2 without paper
Registration deadline: September 1st 2020
The PhD programme Sociology and Social Work, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University
Aalborg University, Campus Copenhagen, more info will be announced at PhD moodle
01.09.2020 kl. 12.00
13.08.2020 at 13.00 PM - 16.00 PM
Title of the thesis: Racialized Representation in Danish Film: Navigating Erasure and Presence
21.08.2020 at 13.00 PM - 16.00 PM
Title of thesis: The Historical Relations between UNESCO and China with a Focus on the Mutual Impacts, 1945-1950
07.09.2020 at 13.30 PM - 09.09.2020 at 15.00 PM